Fight for freedoms: to choose or not to choose

Just from looking at the sites the prochoice site as information and what their mission is right when you click on the site.  The prolife site brings me to a bunch of links within their site and does not really tell me any information right from the site.  The information on the prochoice site was generally more proven it was backed with facts and scientific information as well as stories from women.  It did a good job at explaining their position while still given information on the other choice, one women on their blog said that she kept her baby and she never regretted the consequences. while the prolife side argues religious reasons and federal reasons (these being laws that they helped get created and into practice) the pro-lifers argue the un safeness of the procedure, this being because of the laws that the pro-lifers put into place that may have made abortion less safe. While the techniques are relatively unsafe, the people that do abortions in the medical field know how to solve those issues or have a hospital or doctor on staff who can in case of an emergence.  While prolife is winning the battle because of all the people who think that it is wrong and all the laws against it that are in or are trying to get in to practice that prevent or make it hard for doctors to do abortions among other things.   The approach that they are taking on the prolife side is the prohibition type approach, it is not illegal to drink alcohol just illegal to own make or sell it, it is not illegal to have an abortion in some states just illegal to give out or maintain or give out information about the abortions.  my opinion on this has not changed because of the site and that is mainly because of my biases leaning towards prochoice, also based on the site the prochoice side has a better site with information easy to read and available while pro life's site has millions of things to click on and is graphically uninteresting.